<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Eugene's observations</title>
		<link>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php?blog=5</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-UK</language>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.1"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>Bad broadband signal ?  Invest in a quality splitter aka microfilter.</title>
			<link>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/09/05/bad-broadband-signal-invest-in-a-quality?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:36:56 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Eugene Gardner</dc:creator>
			<category domain="alt">Articles</category>
<category domain="main">Technical Tips</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">126@http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;If you are a long way from the exchange and want to make the most of what you get, here are two top tips:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;
Connect your router to the master socket - the one closest to the point where your phone line enters the property.  Now use a wired connection (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet&quot;&gt;Ethernet&lt;/a&gt; if you can position the wire safely or &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePlug_Powerline_Alliance&quot;&gt;mains electrical circuit&lt;/a&gt; with a couple of adapters otherwise) to transport the signal to your computer(s).&lt;/li&gt;


  &lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;So small and oft forgotten, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adslnation.co.uk/support/filters.php&quot;&gt;microfilters&lt;/a&gt; account for many a poor broadband signal.  Generally speaking, skip the tiny devices that plug right into the socket and use either one built in to the socket itself, or one with a little tail.  It is worth spending a little more to get a quality components.  Better ones will contain something like&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;1 Spark Gap&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;4 Ferrite cores&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;5 Diodes&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;5 Capacitors&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;7 Resistors&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;2 Transistors&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheap devices are smaller as they may contain only &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;1 Ferrite core (2 coils)&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;1 Diode&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;2 Capacitors&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;2 Resistors&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and can not do a decent job of filtering the high frequency broadband from the lower frequency analogue voice signals.  If your phone line sounds anything other than crystal clear, disconnect all other devices connected to the phone line and see if the problem remains.  If it does, replace the microfilter with one costing no less than &amp;#163;5.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/09/05/bad-broadband-signal-invest-in-a-quality?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a long way from the exchange and want to make the most of what you get, here are two top tips:</p>
<ol>
  <li>
Connect your router to the master socket - the one closest to the point where your phone line enters the property.  Now use a wired connection (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet">Ethernet</a> if you can position the wire safely or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePlug_Powerline_Alliance">mains electrical circuit</a> with a couple of adapters otherwise) to transport the signal to your computer(s).</li>


  <li><p>So small and oft forgotten, <a href="http://www.adslnation.co.uk/support/filters.php">microfilters</a> account for many a poor broadband signal.  Generally speaking, skip the tiny devices that plug right into the socket and use either one built in to the socket itself, or one with a little tail.  It is worth spending a little more to get a quality components.  Better ones will contain something like</p>
<ul>
  <li>1 Spark Gap</li>
  <li>4 Ferrite cores</li>
  <li>5 Diodes</li>
  <li>5 Capacitors</li>
  <li>7 Resistors</li>
  <li>2 Transistors</li>
</ul>

<p>Cheap devices are smaller as they may contain only </p>
<ul>
  <li>1 Ferrite core (2 coils)</li>
  <li>1 Diode</li>
  <li>2 Capacitors</li>
  <li>2 Resistors</li>
</ul>
<p>and can not do a decent job of filtering the high frequency broadband from the lower frequency analogue voice signals.  If your phone line sounds anything other than crystal clear, disconnect all other devices connected to the phone line and see if the problem remains.  If it does, replace the microfilter with one costing no less than &#163;5.</p></li>
</ol><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/09/05/bad-broadband-signal-invest-in-a-quality?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/09/05/bad-broadband-signal-invest-in-a-quality?blog=5#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Dual booting</title>
			<link>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/29/dual-booting?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:43:37 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Eugene Gardner</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">General</category>
<category domain="alt">Articles</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">125@http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;I have recently set up three different clients with &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_boot&quot;&gt;dual boot&lt;/a&gt; configurations - that is: the ability when you switch the computer on to select which operating system you want to run.  This is done by dividing up the disk (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_partitioning&quot;&gt;partitioning&lt;/a&gt;) into three sections: one for each operating system and a third for the shared data (photos, music etc.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;The first was Windows XP and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxmint.com/&quot;&gt;Mint Distro&lt;/a&gt;) to give the user the opportunity to evaluate Linux as a free alternative to Windows.&lt;/li&gt;

  &lt;li&gt;Then XP as it had been used for four years on one partition and a new installation of XP on the other.  This let the user get used to a much faster clean install without giving up the option of using programs the source files and/or product keys of which were long lost. &lt;/li&gt;
 
  &lt;li&gt;Finally was Windows XP and Windows 7 to give the user time to ease into the new user interface while keeping a slippered foot in the door of the comfortable.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/29/dual-booting?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently set up three different clients with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_boot">dual boot</a> configurations - that is: the ability when you switch the computer on to select which operating system you want to run.  This is done by dividing up the disk (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_partitioning">partitioning</a>) into three sections: one for each operating system and a third for the shared data (photos, music etc.)</p>

<ul>
  <li>The first was Windows XP and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution">Linux</a> (<a href="http://www.linuxmint.com/">Mint Distro</a>) to give the user the opportunity to evaluate Linux as a free alternative to Windows.</li>

  <li>Then XP as it had been used for four years on one partition and a new installation of XP on the other.  This let the user get used to a much faster clean install without giving up the option of using programs the source files and/or product keys of which were long lost. </li>
 
  <li>Finally was Windows XP and Windows 7 to give the user time to ease into the new user interface while keeping a slippered foot in the door of the comfortable.</li>
</ul><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/29/dual-booting?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/29/dual-booting?blog=5#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Overlay install or Repairing Windows XP</title>
			<link>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/28/overlay-install-or-repairing-windows-xp?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:59:32 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Eugene Gardner</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Technical Tips</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">124@http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it is quicker to reinstall Windows than identify and resolve all faults.  With Vista and later this has to be done by booting off the hard disk but in XP is can be done from the CD.  However, if Windows is so corrupted that the repair option is not offered some small adjustments can make it return - although the omens for a successful repair are not good.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Boot to Recovery Console and then &lt;code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
copy {ODD}:\i386\ntldr C:\&lt;br /&gt;
copy {ODD}:\i386\ntdetect.com C:\&lt;br /&gt;
attrib -H -R -S C:\boot.ini &lt;br /&gt;
del C:\boot.ini&lt;br /&gt;
BootCfg /Rebuild &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now remove all hardware not essential for a boot.  &lt;br /&gt;
Next time you boot off the CD you should have a repair option.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Before you launch into a repair of Windows XP make sure that service packs later than the level on the installation medium are removed, and that Internet Explorer is not at a later version than on the CD.  Details at &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917964/&quot;&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917964/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is one other cause of repair failure that can be easily fixed: a corrupted registry hive.  In this case just follow the instructions at &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307545/en-us&quot;&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307545/en-us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/28/overlay-install-or-repairing-windows-xp?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes it is quicker to reinstall Windows than identify and resolve all faults.  With Vista and later this has to be done by booting off the hard disk but in XP is can be done from the CD.  However, if Windows is so corrupted that the repair option is not offered some small adjustments can make it return - although the omens for a successful repair are not good.</p>

<p>Boot to Recovery Console and then <code><br />
copy {ODD}:\i386\ntldr C:\<br />
copy {ODD}:\i386\ntdetect.com C:\<br />
attrib -H -R -S C:\boot.ini <br />
del C:\boot.ini<br />
BootCfg /Rebuild </code></p>

<p>Now remove all hardware not essential for a boot.  <br />
Next time you boot off the CD you should have a repair option.  </p>

<p>Before you launch into a repair of Windows XP make sure that service packs later than the level on the installation medium are removed, and that Internet Explorer is not at a later version than on the CD.  Details at <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917964/">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917964/</a></p>

<p>There is one other cause of repair failure that can be easily fixed: a corrupted registry hive.  In this case just follow the instructions at <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307545/en-us">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307545/en-us</a></p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/28/overlay-install-or-repairing-windows-xp?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/28/overlay-install-or-repairing-windows-xp?blog=5#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Custom built or off-the-shelf PCs - the cost of convenience</title>
			<link>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/04/custom-built-or-off-the-shelf-pcs-the-co?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:57:50 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Eugene Gardner</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Security</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">123@http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;A client asked me to design a new bespoke PC for him last week.  I did so and sent him a detailed specification that would be balanced in the likely use he would put it to.  This totalled &lt;strong&gt;&amp;#163;618&lt;/strong&gt; inc. VAT.  He looked around the Internet and found a Dell Optiplex 380 and wondered why the PC I specified was &amp;#163;219 more expensive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After a testing time trying to find out the full specification of the Dell PC I was able to send my client the results as a table that compared my initial spec (&lt;strong&gt;&amp;#163;618&lt;/strong&gt;), the Dell headline version of the Optiplex 380 (&lt;strong&gt;&amp;#163;399&lt;/strong&gt;) and the Dell version that matched most closely the balanced system I had proposed for him.  The Dell headline version of their system was indeed &amp;#163;219 cheaper, but the components were generally much more modest and did not include items such as a monitor display - in the use my client typically puts his PC to this computer would perform like a dog with no legs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By 'customising' the Dell specification to match as closely as possible the PC I designed for my client the cost rose to exactly &lt;strong&gt;&amp;#163;999&lt;/strong&gt; - a &amp;#163;381 difference.  And what's more, if a Dell main board fails after a couple of years it is next to impossible to get a replacement as Dell are the sole suppliers.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I knew that custom built computers were better value for money than mass produced ones in the long term but I hadn't appreciated just how much of a saving there is from day one.  I should add that I believe Dell are no worse and indeed, somewhat better than other off-the-shelf distributors including large nationwide shops.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/04/custom-built-or-off-the-shelf-pcs-the-co?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A client asked me to design a new bespoke PC for him last week.  I did so and sent him a detailed specification that would be balanced in the likely use he would put it to.  This totalled <strong>&#163;618</strong> inc. VAT.  He looked around the Internet and found a Dell Optiplex 380 and wondered why the PC I specified was &#163;219 more expensive.</p>

<p>After a testing time trying to find out the full specification of the Dell PC I was able to send my client the results as a table that compared my initial spec (<strong>&#163;618</strong>), the Dell headline version of the Optiplex 380 (<strong>&#163;399</strong>) and the Dell version that matched most closely the balanced system I had proposed for him.  The Dell headline version of their system was indeed &#163;219 cheaper, but the components were generally much more modest and did not include items such as a monitor display - in the use my client typically puts his PC to this computer would perform like a dog with no legs.</p>

<p>By 'customising' the Dell specification to match as closely as possible the PC I designed for my client the cost rose to exactly <strong>&#163;999</strong> - a &#163;381 difference.  And what's more, if a Dell main board fails after a couple of years it is next to impossible to get a replacement as Dell are the sole suppliers.  </p>

<p>I knew that custom built computers were better value for money than mass produced ones in the long term but I hadn't appreciated just how much of a saving there is from day one.  I should add that I believe Dell are no worse and indeed, somewhat better than other off-the-shelf distributors including large nationwide shops.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/04/custom-built-or-off-the-shelf-pcs-the-co?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/08/04/custom-built-or-off-the-shelf-pcs-the-co?blog=5#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Solid State Disks (SSDs)</title>
			<link>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/07/04/solid-state-disks-ssds?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 11:07:13 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Eugene Gardner</dc:creator>
			<category domain="alt">General</category>
<category domain="main">Articles</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">122@http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;I have just upgraded my own main PC by cloning the system volume from a 10,000rpm velociraptor to a SSD with no moving parts.  The benefits are that &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;with no moving parts the mean time before failure rises dramatically - meaning that it's lifetime is much longer;&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;it produces far less heat than conventional disks which means less cooling is required which means less noise;&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;because less cooling is required and due to its own construction the power consumption is reduced;&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;it transfers data at about three times the speed of a regular disk.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How much faster the computer appears depends on which programs are run and how, but it is certainly noticeably faster. The difference would be even more noticeable had I been running the usual 7,200rpm disk rather than the velociraptor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/07/04/solid-state-disks-ssds?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just upgraded my own main PC by cloning the system volume from a 10,000rpm velociraptor to a SSD with no moving parts.  The benefits are that </p>
<ul>
  <li>with no moving parts the mean time before failure rises dramatically - meaning that it's lifetime is much longer;</li>
  <li>it produces far less heat than conventional disks which means less cooling is required which means less noise;</li>
  <li>because less cooling is required and due to its own construction the power consumption is reduced;</li>
  <li>it transfers data at about three times the speed of a regular disk.</li>
</ul>

<p>How much faster the computer appears depends on which programs are run and how, but it is certainly noticeably faster. The difference would be even more noticeable had I been running the usual 7,200rpm disk rather than the velociraptor.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/07/04/solid-state-disks-ssds?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/07/04/solid-state-disks-ssds?blog=5#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Buying cheap</title>
			<link>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/05/30/buying-cheap?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 14:09:02 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Eugene Gardner</dc:creator>
			<category domain="alt">General</category>
<category domain="main">Articles</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">121@http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;I have recently received a mail out of the blue with a pointer to a hand held &amp;#8216;PC&amp;#8217; and the one line question: &amp;#8216;Should I buy it?&amp;#8217;  This is an extreme case of a common situation where the potential buyer sees a tempting ad and then finds a reason to buy the object.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By not starting the process correctly &amp;#8211; i.e. asking &amp;#8216;what tasks do I want done&amp;#8217; (trade description: requirements analysis), the chances of finding a suitable combination of components, price and after sales service are slim.  In this case my correspondent wanted to run applications locally to write a letter or use instant messaging so the 2GB storage would have been inadequate and the 128MB volatile memory would make the device perform like a dog with no legs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At &amp;#163;89.99 the &amp;#8216;portable mini&amp;#8217; computer is certainly cheap, but would you really be comfortable squinting at a 7&amp;#8221; screen or typing on an 8&amp;#8221; keyboard for anything but occasional web based mail messages ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The old adage &amp;#8216;you get what you pay for&amp;#8217; really applies with computing, and as with all purchases of things you don&amp;#8217;t fully understand, buying a little independent consultancy first will usually save big bucks over the lifetime of the product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/05/30/buying-cheap?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently received a mail out of the blue with a pointer to a hand held &#8216;PC&#8217; and the one line question: &#8216;Should I buy it?&#8217;  This is an extreme case of a common situation where the potential buyer sees a tempting ad and then finds a reason to buy the object.</p>

<p>By not starting the process correctly &#8211; i.e. asking &#8216;what tasks do I want done&#8217; (trade description: requirements analysis), the chances of finding a suitable combination of components, price and after sales service are slim.  In this case my correspondent wanted to run applications locally to write a letter or use instant messaging so the 2GB storage would have been inadequate and the 128MB volatile memory would make the device perform like a dog with no legs.</p>

<p>At &#163;89.99 the &#8216;portable mini&#8217; computer is certainly cheap, but would you really be comfortable squinting at a 7&#8221; screen or typing on an 8&#8221; keyboard for anything but occasional web based mail messages ?</p>

<p>The old adage &#8216;you get what you pay for&#8217; really applies with computing, and as with all purchases of things you don&#8217;t fully understand, buying a little independent consultancy first will usually save big bucks over the lifetime of the product.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/05/30/buying-cheap?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/05/30/buying-cheap?blog=5#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Letting the computer settle down.</title>
			<link>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/04/27/letting-the-computer-settle-down?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:11:26 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Eugene Gardner</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Articles</category>
<category domain="alt">Technical Tips</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">120@http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;I have recently fixed two PCs where the owner has installed huge numbers of (mainly free) programs.  In itself this is not a problem, but the more programs that are installed the greater the chance of one unintentionally messing with another - either when they are installed or as a result of them both residing in memory.  Moreover, rectifying unrelated faults often takes more time, and therefore cost, as not only is more testing than usual at the end of a repair required, but there is a greater propensity for configuration changes that adversely affect a program.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The more programs that are installed in memory the slower the PC performs generally as they all compete for a slice of the limited memory resource.  Not only that but as increased &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paging&quot;&gt;paging&lt;/a&gt; is required, there is a greater risk that program faults will develop when shutting down a computer that is completing maintenance operations in the background.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In general, but especially in the above cases, I recommend having &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU&quot;&gt;CPU&lt;/a&gt; and disk activity meters permanently visible on the desktop.  These are freely available, for example as gadgets from &lt;a href=&quot;http://vista.gallery.microsoft.com/vista/SideBar.aspx?mkt=en-us&quot;&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://desktop.google.com/plugins/&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This will enable you to postpone significant events (e.g. program (un)installation, shutting down the computer, calling for support when something is not working as expected) until the PC is &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiesce&quot;&gt;quiesced&lt;/a&gt; - hence, limiting the likelihood of interrupting an important modification to the system state.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In much the same vein, it is good to let the system finish its start up procedures as much as possible before beginning work.  So start the computer 5 minutes before you start work and shut down 5 minutes after you close the last program to reduce the risk of interrupting important background tasks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/04/27/letting-the-computer-settle-down?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently fixed two PCs where the owner has installed huge numbers of (mainly free) programs.  In itself this is not a problem, but the more programs that are installed the greater the chance of one unintentionally messing with another - either when they are installed or as a result of them both residing in memory.  Moreover, rectifying unrelated faults often takes more time, and therefore cost, as not only is more testing than usual at the end of a repair required, but there is a greater propensity for configuration changes that adversely affect a program.</p>

<p>The more programs that are installed in memory the slower the PC performs generally as they all compete for a slice of the limited memory resource.  Not only that but as increased <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paging">paging</a> is required, there is a greater risk that program faults will develop when shutting down a computer that is completing maintenance operations in the background.</p>

<p>In general, but especially in the above cases, I recommend having <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU">CPU</a> and disk activity meters permanently visible on the desktop.  These are freely available, for example as gadgets from <a href="http://vista.gallery.microsoft.com/vista/SideBar.aspx?mkt=en-us">Microsoft</a> or <a href="http://desktop.google.com/plugins/">Google</a></p>

<p>This will enable you to postpone significant events (e.g. program (un)installation, shutting down the computer, calling for support when something is not working as expected) until the PC is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiesce">quiesced</a> - hence, limiting the likelihood of interrupting an important modification to the system state.</p>

<p>In much the same vein, it is good to let the system finish its start up procedures as much as possible before beginning work.  So start the computer 5 minutes before you start work and shut down 5 minutes after you close the last program to reduce the risk of interrupting important background tasks.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/04/27/letting-the-computer-settle-down?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/04/27/letting-the-computer-settle-down?blog=5#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>phishing and reliance on tooltips or the status bar</title>
			<link>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/03/14/phishing-and-reliance-on-tooltips-or-the?blog=5</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:32:46 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Eugene Gardner</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Security</category>
<category domain="alt">General</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">119@http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Many people now are aware that phishing is the criminally fraudulent process of attempting to acquire sensitive information such as usernames, passwords and credit card details by masquerading as a trustworthy entity in an e-mail - usually a hyperlink to a web site.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To protect themselves from being spoofed, some people let the mouse pointer hover over the link and read the destination address in the status bar, but this is not a safe way to detect phishing because the status bar can easily be programmed by Javascript so show something legitimate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only safe way is to open your browser and type an address (or use a favourite/bookmark) into the appropriate field.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/03/14/phishing-and-reliance-on-tooltips-or-the?blog=5&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people now are aware that phishing is the criminally fraudulent process of attempting to acquire sensitive information such as usernames, passwords and credit card details by masquerading as a trustworthy entity in an e-mail - usually a hyperlink to a web site.  </p>

<p>To protect themselves from being spoofed, some people let the mouse pointer hover over the link and read the destination address in the status bar, but this is not a safe way to detect phishing because the status bar can easily be programmed by Javascript so show something legitimate.</p>

<p>The only safe way is to open your browser and type an address (or use a favourite/bookmark) into the appropriate field.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/03/14/phishing-and-reliance-on-tooltips-or-the?blog=5">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://www.1computercare.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/03/14/phishing-and-reliance-on-tooltips-or-the?blog=5#comments</comments>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
